Case Base Reasonning

Case-Based Reasoning Module of RIPPLE ES searches for the alternative strategies/ policies that certain producers/ institutions could adopt to better achieve their own objectives/ missions. To do this, RIPPLE-CBR Module refers to strategies/ policies used by producers/ institutions in similar contexts, and to reasoning rules specifying the ways to be used to find out the case-studies that are 'comparable/ similar' to a given target producer/ institution (matching rules) and to adapt the strategies/ policies of these ones to the target case (adaptation rules).

Case-Based Reasoning Session includes the following steps:
1. End-User of ES loads Data and Reasoning Rules to be used by ES (5)
2. End-User describes the structural and contextual features of a target producer/ institution X by referring to appropriate criteria (ref. Appendix VARS-A1/2-B1/2-/C1/2)
3. ES searches for the studied producers/ institutions that match to the target case X, by referring to appropriate matching rules and assessment criteria (ref. Append. CBR: RULES A)
4. End-User selects one of the L most effective retrieved cases, and asks ES to adapt aims, targets, actions of this one to case X, via adaptation rules  (ref. App. CBR: RULES B)
5. End-User stores the alternative strategy/ policy X[y] pointed out by ES, or searches for an other one by referring to an other effective retrieved case.

 

 

Publications

 

Integrating case and model-based reasoning for thinking about the future: results from France. Working paper 12. Regional images and the promotion of quality products and services in the lagging regions of the European Union. Final regional report..

 
This paper reports the results of an attempt of integrating case and model-based reasoning for thinking about the future of regional images and the promotion of quality products and services in Auvergne and in Normandie. Part A reports results in the Production and Consumption Arenas: production ptrategies to be promoted, assessment scenarios, actions to be disseminated condition of adoption and success of these actions. Part B reports the results in Regulation Arena: prominent strategies, ways to improve the institutional system. In the two regions, the studied institutional system would gain in strength if institutions would revise their point of view about quality factors and about success factors of businesses. Or convince consumers and producers to adopt their perceptions. The system also would gain in strength if institutions would act to develop courses in construction and use of regional imagery for producers and institutions, develop courses in consumers' perceptions about quality factors, create structures facilitating contacts between consumers, producers and institutions, and integrate consumer's organisations into structures devoted to the management of quality. Focusing institutional strategies on training would increase the motivity of most institutions supporting the development of businesses and about 50% of institutions supporting the promotion of quality. But at the opposite, this strategy would decrease the motivity of about 50% of other institutions. Focusing institutional strategies on creating/ using regional images would increase the synergy of strategies of most institutions. But it would decrease the relative prominence of the current leaders.
 

Accès au document

 

Métadonnées du document

 

Contact

© 2014 Tous droits réservés.

Créer un site internet gratuit Webnode